Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,659
McFadden v. USA
as 4:2023cv00946
Petitioner: Burgess McFadden
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
USA v. $41,700.00 in US Currency
as 4:2023cv00937
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: $41,700.00 in US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Phillips County, Arkansas v. USA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00936
Plaintiff: Phillips County, Arkansas
Defendant: USA and A Rock Construction Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Richardson et al v. USA
as 4:2023cv00902
Plaintiff: Sarah Ann Richardson and Mary Lou Richardson
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Smith v. SMS Group Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00199
Plaintiff: Brandon Smith
Defendant: SMS Group Inc, SMS Group GmbH, SMS USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Elbert v. USA
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff: James M Elbert, III
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hicks v. USA
as 4:2023cv00888
Petitioner: Eric G Hicks
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Naillieux v. USA et al
as 4:2023cv00883
Plaintiff: Jason Wayne Naillieux
Defendant: USA, Does Ploicing, Judges, and Office employees and Does Policing, Judges, and Office employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Tucker v. USA
as 4:2023cv00864
Petitioner: Kevin Lynn Tucker
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McAdoo v. USA
as 3:2023cv00189
Petitioner: Jordan McAdoo
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?