Cases 41 - 50 of 3,827
Krieg v. Warden of USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Eric Krieg
Respondent:
Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Glafiro Gonzalez v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 2:2024cv01944
Plaintiff:
Glafiro Gonzalez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison, Warden USP Lompoc, Assistant Warden USP Lompoc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields v. Warden of USP Lee County
as 7:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Sonny Adam Shields
Respondent:
Warden of USP Lee County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bells v. NDA, et al.
as 24-1085
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE B. BELLS, JR.
Defendant:
VICTORVILLE USP CORRECTIONS NDA, SHINN, MCCOLLOUGH and others
Kenneth Reid v. Warden Canaan USP
as 24-1367
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. REID
Defendant:
WARDEN CANAAN USP
Figueroa v. USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
Luis Figueroa
Respondent:
USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Guzman v. Warden, USP Marion
as 5:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
Ricardo Guzman
Respondent:
Warden, USP Marion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ford v. USP Big Sandy, Medical Director et al
as 7:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Samuel B. Ford
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, Medical Director, Warden, USP Big Sandy, Albert Bourla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schaefer v. Warden, Coleman USP
as 6:2024cv00324
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Respondent:
Warden, Coleman USP and Warden, USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Schaefer v. Warden, Coleman USP
as 5:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
