Cases 1 - 10 of 444
Hernandez Morales v. Garland
as 24-2324
Petitioner:
ULISES HERNANDEZ MORALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Dominguez et al v. Ford Motor Co.
as 2:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Alexis Dominguez and Ulises Artemio Dominguez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Cavazos-De Fuente v. Paul, Warden
as 5:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Ulises Cavazos-De Fuente and Ulises Cavazos-De La Fuente
Respondent:
David Paul, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Ramirez
as 24-837
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
OMAR ULISES RODRIGUEZ-RAMIREZ
United States of America v. Rodriguez Ramirez
as 24-814
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
OMAR ULISES RODRIGUEZ RAMIREZ
Romero Romero v. Garland
as 24-743
Petitioner:
NECTALI ULISES ROMERO ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Certified Guaranty Company, LLC v. Zanello et al
as 1:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
Certified Guaranty Company, LLC
Defendant:
ULISES ZANELLO and BREE RIVA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Schild et al v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02715
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ann Schild and Walter Charles Schild
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Michael Smith, Gilberto Ulises Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Eurostone et al
as 2:2023cv09912
Plaintiff:
Atain Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Eurostone a California limited liability company doing business as European Surfaces LLC, Martin Melendez Murillo, Rufina Barajas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
