Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Brunswick v. Unisys Corporation
as 2:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Nathan Brunswick
Defendant:
Unisys Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
UNISYS CORPORATION v. GILBERT et al
as 2:2023cv00555
Counter Defendant:
UNISYS CORPORATION
Counter Claimant:
LEON GILBERT
Defendant:
MICHAEL MCGARVEY, ATOS SE and ATOS IT SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES, INC.
STROUGO v. UNISYS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv04529
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STROUGO
Defendant:
UNISYS CORPORATION, PETER A. ALTABEF and DEBRA WINKLER MCCANN
BRUNSWICK v. UNISYS CORPORATION
as 2:2022cv02906
Plaintiff:
NATHAN BRUNSWICK
Defendant:
UNISYS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Gallagher v. Unysis Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Gallagher
Defendant:
Unysis Corporation, Maureen Sweeny, Does 1 - 50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Webb et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv00145
Defendant:
3M Company, Bayer Consumer Care Holdings LLC, Bayer Samson II LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Allan Watson, Robin A. Webb, Cynthia M. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Kranz et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00588
Defendant:
Cameron International Corporation, Elliott Company, FMC Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kranz and Lucinda Kranz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 as Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCOM IP LLC v. UNISYS Corporation
as 3:2021cv02288
Plaintiff:
MCOM IP LLC
Defendant:
UNISYS Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CopyWatch, Inc. v. Unisys Corporation
as 1:2021cv07386
Plaintiff:
COPYWATCH, INC.
Defendant:
Unisys Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06401
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
