Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Homepoint v. Trans United Financial Services, Inc.
as 5:2023cv11512
Plaintiff:
Homepoint
Defendant:
Trans United Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Petersen v. Bitters et al
as 8:2016cv00183
Defendant:
William E. Bitters, Robert W. Boland, Jr., John L. Henry and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Joyce Rosamond Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Petersen v. Bitters et al
as 4:2014cv00780
Plaintiff:
Joyce Rosamond Petersen
Defendant:
William E Bitters, Robert W. Boland, Jr., John L. Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
UNITED FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. v. CITY FINANCIAL, INC.
as 2:2011cv00835
Plaintiff:
UNITED FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
CITY FINANCIAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Merced et al v. Bank United, FSB et al
as 2:2010cv03393
Plaintiff:
Casildo Merced , Mela Milagros Merced and Sheila Doctor
Defendant:
Bank United, FSB (Bank United Financial Services, Inc.) a Corporation, Popular Mortgage Servicing, Inc. a Corporation, E-Loan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv22343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010bk00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
