Cases 61 - 70 of 83,266
United States of America v. Mendoza
as 24-3128
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TOMAS MENDOZA
United States of America v. Lopez-Orduno
as 24-3135
Defendant:
MARCOS LOPEZ-ORDUNO and Marco Antonio Lopez-Orduno
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Carrillo
as 24-3157
Defendant:
ROBERT CARRILLO and Robert Carillo
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mario Abernathy v.Glenda Marti et al
as 5:2024cv01042
Defendant:
Wendy Y. Medina, Leon Carlo Sayo, Lisa Sayo and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rocha v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Blas Jesse Rocha, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Caraffa #350727 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Medical Department of Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Doe v. unites states of america
as 6:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Janet Doe
Defendant:
unites states of america
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Doe v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
Janet Doe
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Lambert et al v. Moyer et al
as 6:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M Lambert and United States
Defendant:
William Moyer and Connie Moyer
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
United States of America v. Approximately 74,000 Items of Stolen Merchandise
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately 74,000 Items of Stolen Merchandise
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
