Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
LIBERTY RESOURCES, INC. v. PENNSYLVANIA STATEWIDE INDEPENDENT LIVING COUNCIL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv03423
Plaintiff: LIBERTY RESOURCES, INC.
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA STATEWIDE INDEPENDENT LIVING COUNCIL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, THE ADMINISTRATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, REHABILITATION SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 ra
State of Ohio v. US Department of Education, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-3397
Respondent: BETSY DEVOS, In her official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Education, Rehabilitation Services Administration and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Rehabilitation Services Administration
Not Yet Classified: JAMES CYRUS and STATE OF OHIO, Opportunities for Ohioans with Disabilities, Bureau of Services of Visually Impared, Business Enterprise Program
Texas Workforce Commission v. United States Dept of Educ We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-50283
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, REHABILITATION SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF SERVICES FOR THE BLIND V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION REHABILITATION SERVICES ADMINISTRATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01058
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF SERVICES FOR THE BLIND
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, REHABILITATION SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Intervenor_defendant: Lloyd Chadwick Hooks
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Ohio, Opportunities for Ohioans with Disabilities, Bureau of Services of Visually Impaired, Business Enterprise Program v. United States Department of Education, Rehabilitation Services Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00873
Petitioner: State of Ohio, Opportunities for Ohioans with Disabilities, Bureau of Services of Visually Impaired, Business Enterprise Program
Respondent: United States Department of Education, Rehabilitation Services Administration and Betsy Devos
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Hawaii, Department of Human Services, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Hoopono-Services for the Blind We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00430
Plaintiff: State of Hawaii, Department of Human Services, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Hoopono-Services for the Blind
Defendant: Army, Department of, United States and United States Department of Education, Rehabilitation Services Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Tyler v. United States Dept. of Educ., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-6074
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellant: NOEL TYLER, as interin director of the Oklahoma Department of Rehabilitation Services
Defendant Counterclaimant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, REHABILITATION SERVICES ADMINISTRATION and DAVID ALTSTATT, SR.
Texas Workforce Commission v. United States Department of Education, Rehabilitation Services Administration
as 3:2017cv00026
Notice Only Party: Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff: Texas Workforce Commission
Defendant: United States Department of Education, Rehabilitation Services Administration
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3373 Appeal of Decision - DOI
Tyler v. United States Department of Education Rehabilitation Services Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00137
Plaintiff: Noel Tyler
Defendant: United States Department of Education Rehabilitation Services Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anthony Sauer v. U.S. Dept. of Education, etc.
as 10-55877
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANTHONY P. SAUER, Director of the California Department of Rehabilitation
Intervenor: DAVID ZELICKSON
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, REHABILITATION SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?