Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 128
National Association v. Garland
as 23-11138
Plaintiff / Appellee: National Association for Gun Rights, Incorporated, Texas Gun Rights, Incorporated, Patrick Carey and others
Defendant / Appellant: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, In his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Ascent Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Garland et al
as 2:2023cv08260
Plaintiff: Ascent Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland, United States Department of Justice, United States Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Mack v. USA
as 23-60558
Plaintiff / Appellant: Joy Mack, Others so Affected
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America, United States Department of Justice, and U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, HHS Office for Human Research Protections, and OHRP Director Dr. Jerry A. Menikoff and others
Bessler v. Board of Immigration Appeals et al
as 2:2023cv06362
Plaintiff: Mr. Michael Herman Bessler and Michael Bessler
Defendant: Hon. David Wetmore, Terri Robinson, Hon. Ur M. Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Watterson v. ATF
as 23-40556
Plaintiff / Appellant: Blake J. Watterson
Defendant / Appellee: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice and others
Doe v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv01139
Petitioner: John Doe
Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 23-10718
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellant: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae: Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Incorporated, Gun Owners for Safety, Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund and others
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff: Morehouse Enterprises, LLC doing business as Bridge City Ordnance, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and Gun Owners Foundation
Defendant: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice, Steven M. Dettelbach and others
Amicus Curiae: Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, March for Our Lives and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
National Rifle Association v. Bureau of Alcohol
as 23-10707
Defendant / Appellee: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Regina Lombardo, in her offical capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice and others
Petitioner / Appellant: National Rifle Association of America
Black Economic Council of Massachusetts, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Justice et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv11378
Plaintiff: Black Economic Council of Massachusetts, Inc., Greater Boston Latino Network and Amplify Latinx
Defendant: United States Department of Justice and Christine Stoneman
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?