Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Annex Medical, Inc., et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 13-1118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Annex Medical, Inc., Stuart Lind and Tom Janas
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Hilda Solis, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, Timothy F. Geithner, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Treasury and others
Katherine Graddy v. U.S. Dept of Homeland Security, et al
as 12-3571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Katherine Sue Graddy
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Homeland Security, (DHS), Janet Napolitano, in her Official Capacity as Director of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, in his Official Capacity as The Former Director of Homeland Security and others
American Pulverizer Co. et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2012cv03459
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of Labor and others
Plaintiff:
American Pulverizer Co. , Hustler Conveyor Co. , City Welding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
State of Nebraska, et al v. US Dept. of HHS, et al
as 12-3238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
State of Nebraska, by and through, Jon C. Bruning, Attorney General of the State of Nebraska, State of South Carolina, by and through, Alan Wilson, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, State of Texas, by and through, Greg Abbott, Attorney General of the State of Texas and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Treasury and others
College of the Ozarks v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2012cv03428
Plaintiff:
The School of the Ozarks, Inc.,
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Archdiocese of St. Louis et al v. Sebelius et al
as 4:2012cv00924
Plaintiff:
Archdiocese of St. Louis and Catholic Charities of St. Louis
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Hilda L. Solis, Timothy F. Geithner and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Wattleton v. United States Department of Treasury et al
as 0:2012cv00683
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
United States Department of Treasury, Federal Medical Center Trust Fund Administrator and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Nebraska et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2012cv03035
Plaintiff:
Sister Mary Catherine, CK, Catholic Mutual Relief Society of America, Catholic Social Services and others
Defendant:
Timothy F. Geithner, Kathleen Sebelius, Hilda L. Solis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Arkansas Securities Commission v. Nick Lynn Technologies, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv05020
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Securities Commission
Defendant:
Nick Lynn Technologies, Inc., Lendell Earl Hillhouse, Sr. and James Robin Pace
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Lendell Earl Hillhouse, Sr.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Heath Absure , Theodore Holder , Jim Lundsford and others
Counter_claimant:
Lendell Earl Hillhouse, Sr.
Counter_defendant:
Arkansas Securities Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peter Kinder, et al v. Timothy Geithner, et al
as 11-1973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Peter Kinder, Missouri Lieutenant Governor, Dale Morris, Samantha Hill and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the United States Department of Treasury, Hilda Solis, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
