Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rethink35 et al v. Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff: Rethink35, Save Our Springs Alliance, Austin Justice Coalition and others
Defendant: Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT), Marc Williams, United States Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Arrow Indian Contractors Incorporated v. United States Federal Highway Administration, Central Federal Lands Division
as 2:2023cv02085
Plaintiff: Arrow Indian Contractors Incorporated
Defendant: United States Federal Highway Administration, Central Federal Lands Division
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Rocky Mountain Peace & Justice Center, et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al
as 21-1310
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROCKY MOUNTAIN PEACE & JUSTICE CENTER, CANDELAS GLOWS/ROCKY FLATS GLOWS, ROCKY FLATS RIGHT TO KNOW and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
No More Freeways et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 3:2021cv00498
Plaintiff: No More Freeways, Eliot Neighborhood Association and Neighbors for Clean Air
Defendant: United States Department of Transportation, Thomas D. Everett and United States Federal Highway Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Rocky Mountain Peace & Justice Center et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01017
Plaintiff: Rocky Mountain Peace & Justice Center , Candelas Glows/Rocky Flats Glows , Rocky Flats Right to Know and others
Defendant: United States Fish and Wildlife Service , Greg Sheehan , Ryan Zinke and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Detroit International Bridge, et al v. Government of Canada, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-5270
Plaintiff - Appellant: Detroit International Bridge Company, a Michigan corporation and Canadian Transit Company, a Canadian special act corporation
Defendant - Appellee: Government of Canada, Federal Highway Administration, Victor Mendez, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Federal Highway Administration and others
Detroit International Bridge, et al v. Government of Canada, et al
as 15-5086
Plaintiff - Appellant: Detroit International Bridge Company, a Michigan corporation and Canadian Transit Company, a Canadian special act corporation
Defendant - Appellee: Government of Canada, Federal Highway Administration, Victor Mendez, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Federal Highway Administration and others
Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 12-20697
Plaintiff - Appellee: SIERRA CLUB
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, CHRISTOPHER W. SALLESE, In his official capacity as District Engineer, Galveston District-U.S. Corps of Engineers, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, In his official capacity as Chief and Commander of Engineers, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
DETROIT INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE COMPANY et al v. GOVERNMENT OF CANADA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00476
Plaintiff: DETROIT INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE COMPANY and CANADIAN TRANSIT COMPANY
Defendant: GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, UNITED STATES FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, VICTOR MENDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
MERCO INC. et al v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00552
Plaintiff: MERCO INC. and THE COUNTY OF MORRIS
Defendant: UNITED STATES FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?