Cases 11 - 20 of 236
Murugaiyan v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2023cv04872
Plaintiff:
Senthil Murugaiyan and Senthil Mohan Murugaiyan
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Louis DeJoy and Tammy Hull
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Jones v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2023cv01151
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Washington State Department of Revenue and Bob Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35378
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Helen Le v. USPS, et al
as 23-15816
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HELEN LE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, CEO, Director, Supervisor and SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk at Supreme Court of US
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Robinson v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2022cv06014
Plaintiff:
Joel L Robinson doing business as JRs Legal Services
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-36009
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Abolhassan v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2022cv01682
Plaintiff:
Khatereh Abolhassan
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
