Cases 1 - 10 of 13,999
Douse v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
James Nathaniel Douse
Defendant:
United States of America and Greylock McKinnon Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Poblete
as 4:2024cv01855
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Katherine Poblete
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
Mark Adams v. USA, et al
as 24-1429
Plaintiff:
MARK ALAN ADAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, SAGINAW COUNTY, MI and others
United States of America
as 6:2024cv00640
Not Yet Classified:
Better Housing, Incorporated
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
United States of America v. Locke
as 2:2024cv11279
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Holly Locke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 U.S. Plaintiff
United States of America v. Wilson
as 2:2024mc50463
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carlo Wilson
Petitioner:
Attorney Grievance Administrator and Attorney Grievance Commission
USA v. Gill
as 2:2024mc50465
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jagrant Singh Gill
Petitioner:
Ms. Kirandeep Gill
United States of America v. Calhoun
as 6:2024cv03147
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cortez Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
United States of America v. Nguyen
as 8:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sandy Mai Trang Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml01063
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
