Cases 31 - 40 of 192
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO /CLC v. FRONTIER NORTH, INC.
as 3:2021cv00075
Plaintiff:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO /CLC
Defendant:
FRONTIER NORTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC et al v. Johns Manville
as 3:2021cv00502
Plaintiff:
Local Union No. 216m and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
John Manville and Johns Manville
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
ITT Engineered Valves, LLC v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO CLC, Local 36M
as 5:2021cv00205
Defendant:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO CLC, Local 36M and Local Union No.
Plaintiff:
ITT Engineered Valves, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper. Forestry, et al v. Kelsey-Hayes Company, et al
as 16-1240
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, DANNY O. STEVENS, for themselves and others similarly situated and RONALD D. STRAIT
Defendant / Appellant:
TRW AUTOMOTIVE, INC., TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORPORATION and KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2020cv02876
Plaintiff:
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, CHAD WOLF, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
United Steel, Paper and Forest v. EPA, et al
as 20-1434
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC et al v. National Grid et al
as 4:2020cv11491
Plaintiff:
United Steelworkers of America, Local 12003 and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
National Grid and Benefits Committee of National Grid USA Service Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Mine Workers of America, et alIn re: United Mine Workers of America, et al
as 20-1215
In Re:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC and In re: United Mine Workers of America International Union
SOOS v. ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2020cv00291
Defendant:
ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY and UNITED STEEL PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. SOOS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
BUTCH et al v. ALCOA USA CORP. et al
as 3:2019cv00258
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. WYATT, UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO /CLC, ALUMINUM TRADES COUNCIL OF WENATCHEE, WASHINGTON AFL-CIO and others
Defendant:
ALCOA USA CORP. and RETIREES GROUP BENEFIT PLAN FOR CERTAIN HOURLY EMPLOYEES OF ALCOA USA CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
