Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Bonilla v. Mendoza et al
as 1:2023cv07152
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bonilla
Defendant:
Gustavo Saline Mendoza and Unitex Textile Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Suzuki et al v. C&C Recycling, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv03694
Counter Defendant:
Toru Suzuki, Leticia Suzuki and Unitex, Inc.
Defendant:
C&C Recycling, Inc., Charles Hodge and Globel Southern Recycling, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv01455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Alexander et al v. Unitex Textile Rental Services, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00856
Plaintiff:
Colleen Kelly Alexander and Sean Alexander
Defendant:
Unitex Textile Rental Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
LA Printex Industries Inc v. Mega Printex Inc et al
as 2:2012cv04094
Defendant:
Bloom, Buckle Inc, Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Inc and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Cornerstone Apparel Inc
Plaintiff:
LA Printex Industries Inc
ThirdParty Defendant:
Parlay Apparel Inc and Roes 1 through 20
Castellano-Calderon v. Unitex, Inc.
as 3:2011cv02188
Plaintiff:
Margarita Castellano-Calderon
Defendant:
Unitex, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
L A Printex Industries Inc v. Amanda Vinci Inc et al
as 2:2011cv09351
Defendant:
Amanda Vinci Inc, Big M Inc, Bloom and others
Plaintiff:
L A Printex Industries Inc
Toups et al v. Nalco Company et al
as 2:2011cv02745
Plaintiff:
Timothy Toups , William Serres , Christopher Teal and others
Defendant:
Nalco Company , BP Products North America, Inc. , BP PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1349
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
