Cases 81 - 90 of 3,901
Williams v. Brammer
as 5:2024ct03051
Plaintiff:
Quashon Treyvaughn Williams
Defendant:
Officer Brammer and Unknown Pert Team Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00157
Petitioner:
Sol D. Burke
Respondent:
Unknown and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPRAUVE v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
JON C. SPRAUVE
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peden v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
John Quamaine Peden
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Marvin Moore
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Puller v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Toccara Yvonne Puller and Toccara Y. Puller
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ash v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ash
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, (AMTRAK) v. .028 Acres More or Less of Land et al
as 1:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, (AMTRAK) and National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Defendant:
.028 Acres More or Less of Land, Doretha McFadden, Sean McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
GRIFFITH v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ANN GRIFFITH
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, Tristin Tenney, Angel Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
