Cases 21 - 30 of 79
REED v. LYTLE et al
as 1:2016cv00281
Defendant:
CITY OF CARMEL, OFFICER BLAKE LYTLE, CHAPMAN MIKE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WAYNE REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 2:2015cv00359
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. , Walgreens Store 4750 and Unknown Persons/Employees
Plaintiff:
Kira Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Johnson v. Jennings et al
as 1:2014cv06179
Plaintiff:
Daryl L. Johnson
Defendant:
Sabrina Jennings, Joseph Gillespie, Other Unknown Persons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Von Ryburn v. Williams et al
as 1:2014cv04308
Plaintiff:
Thomas Von Ryburn
Defendant:
Officer Williams, Officer Perdomo, Salim Obasi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Young v. S. Bryant et al
as 3:2014cv03088
Petitioner:
Ricky Young
Defendant:
S. Bryant, Shelly Mikula, Rhonda Meacham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandez v. Pierce et al
as 1:2014cv02116
Plaintiff:
George Albert Fernandez
Defendant:
Guy Pierce, Sr., Stateville Correctional Center N.R.C., Warden Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Khoury v. Michaels Stores Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00386
Plaintiff:
Leila Khoury
Defendant:
Michaels Stores Inc. , Michaels Stores Procurement Company, Inc., Michaels Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ditkowsky et al v. Stern et al
as 1:2014cv00375
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ditkowsky and JoAnne Denison
Defendant:
Adam Stern, Cynthia Farenga, Jerome Larkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
