Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pando Uribe v. Pate
as 26-30453
Petitioner:
Ever A. Pando Uribe
Respondent:
Nathan Pate, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Oakdale
Simon v. Schultz, et al.
as 26-4772
Petitioner:
MAR-NIQUE SIMON
Respondent:
Warden JASON SCHULTZ and DOMINGO URIBE, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62055
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05174
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04343
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Homan, et al. v. County of Riverside
as 26-4232
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS HOMAN, individually and on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, EDUARDO CERVANTES, RYAN GRIGGS and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04526
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mena De Uribe v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2026cv06657
Plaintiff:
Veronica Mena De Uribe
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00415
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
