Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Whitehead v. Urology P.A. et al
as 1:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Dr. Kris Whitehead
Defendant:
Urology P.A., Urologic Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC, Dr. C. Stephen Farmer, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gonzalez v. Goldfarb et al
as 4:2023cv01670
Plaintiff:
Janet L. Gonzalez
Defendant:
MD David Goldfarb, Laura Ceballos, Daisy Salmeron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jason Tarver v. C. Bozeman
as 22-3213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason Tarver
Defendant / Appellee:
C. Bozeman, Urologist, M.D., Arkansas Urology P.A.
OKEEFFE et al v. NORTHERN MAINE ORAL AND FACIAL SURGERY INC et al
as 1:2021cv00274
Defendant:
AROOSTOOK UROLOGY P.A., NORTHERN MAINE ORAL AND FACIAL SURGERY INC and AROOSTOOK UROLOGY INC
Plaintiff:
KEVIN O'KEEFFE and SMARTBOARD LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00828
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Elias v. Bieri et al
as 1:2017cv00785
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Elias
Defendant:
Mark Bieri and Rio Grande Urology, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pena v. Premier Urology, P.A. et al
as 1:2013cv20277
Plaintiff:
Jennifer A. Pena
Defendant:
Premier Urology, P.A., Kendall Laser Spa, P.A. and Robert W Santa Cruz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carr et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02217
Plaintiff:
Iris Geraldine Carr and Ronnie Carleton Carr
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , American Medical Systems, Inc. , Boston Scientific, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
