Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WHITAKER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00457
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
VALERIE WHITAKER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WHITAKER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv18462
Plaintiff:
VALERIE WHITAKER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, KENVUE, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Valerie Whitaker v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2022cv01187
Plaintiff:
Valerie Whitaker
Defendant:
County of Riverside, a legal subdivision of the State of California, County of Riverside and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00897
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Anthony Mann v. C Failey
as 13-6446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. MANN
Defendant - Appellee:
LT C FAILEY, MAJOR SHARONDA SUTTON, WARDEN ROBERT STEVENSON and others
Defendant:
OFFICER MURRAY
Fred Flores, Jr. v. Robert Stevenson, III
as 12-7262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRED FLORES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT M. STEVENSON, III, Warden, SHAONDA SUTTON, Major, JOHN BARKLEY, Associate Warden Programs and others
Mann v. Failey et al
as 0:2011cv02232
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Mann
Defendant:
C Failey, Sheronda Sutton, Robert Stevenson, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Flores v. Stevenson et al
as 2:2011cv01278
Plaintiff:
Fred Flores, Jr
Defendant:
Robert M Stevenson, III, Sharonda Sutton, John Barkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
