Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Smith v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2026cv03307
Plaintiff:
Veronica Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. D'Agostino
as 26-1404
Defendant:
STEVEN G. JAMES, MAE A. D'AGOSTINO, JOSEPH F. BIANCO and others
Plaintiff:
ETHAN DAVIS SMITH, - and JENNIFER L. DEES, -
Smith v. D'Agostino
as 26-1265
Defendant:
MAE A. D'AGOSTINO, JOSEPH F. BIANCO, WILLIAM J. NARDINI and others
Plaintiff:
ETHAN DAVIS SMITH, - and JENI DEES, -
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00974
Plaintiff:
Veronica Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith et al v. American Agcredit, FLCA et al
as 1:2025cv01397
Plaintiff:
Robert Row Smith and Diana Veronica Smith
Defendant:
American Agcredit, FLCA and Total Lender Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith et al v. D'Agostino et al
as 1:2025cv01265
Plaintiff:
Ethan D. Smith and Jennifer L. Dees
Defendant:
Mae A. D'Agostino, Joseph F. Bianco, William J. Nardini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dees v. Zurlo
as 25-1270
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LYNN DEES and ETHAN DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZURLO, JILLIAN KNOX, SAMUAL MAXWELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2025cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Dees v. Zurlo
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LYNN DEES and ETHAN DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
JILLIAN KNOX, SAMUAL MAXWELL, EMILY WILLIAMS and others
Dees et al v. Zurlo et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lynn Dees and Ethan Davis Smith
Defendant:
Michael Zurlo, Jeffrey R. Brown, Jillian Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
