Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Davison v. City of Lorain et al.
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Davison
Defendant:
City of Lorain, Cielo Rodriguez, Mallory Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall Lloyd, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 22-1245
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL B. LLOYD, DUSTIN DAWSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RICK SHAWLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Perez v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv00255
Plaintiff:
Juan Victor Perez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Perez v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv00059
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Juan Victor Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Juan PerezIn re: Juan Perez
as 19-6056
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: JUAN VICTOR PEREZ
Ford Motor Co. F-150 and Ranger Truck Fuel Economy Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2019md02901
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Matthew Smith, Ryan Combs, Al Balls and others
In Re:
Ford Motor Co. F-150 and Ranger Truck Fuel Economy Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Brewer et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2019cv12135
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Leonardi, Kyle Mannion, Dean Kriner and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Perez v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv01197
Petitioner:
Juan Victor Perez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bey v. Jackson et al
as 1:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
Fareed Hasan Bey
Defendant:
Frank G. Jackson, Pauline Tarver, Victor Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
