Cases 1 - 10 of 173
Coleman v. Vining et al
as 6:2024cv06188
Plaintiff:
Laurene Marie Coleman
Defendant:
William Vining, State of New York and Kathy Koscioleck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kraske v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Aleisha Kraske
Defendant:
State of Montana, Brent Lashinski, Marti Vining and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
VINING v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2023cv22951
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VINING
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON, OFFICE OF THE BURLINGTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR, JAMES KOSTOPLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Darden v. Vines
as 23-30700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
O'Neil Darden, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert C. Vines, in his individual and official capacity and M. Bofill Duhe, in his individual and official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
