Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04026
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Clarence Jackson v. State of Illinois, et al
as 20-2718
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE B. JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Bureau of Heraings c/o Division of Vocational Rehabilitational Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
FRANKLIN v. WALTHALL et al
as 1:2019cv01334
Defendant:
Secretary JENNIFER WALTHALL, Director THERESA KOLESZAR, Director KYLEE HOPE and others
Plaintiff:
LAYNE a. FRANKLIN and LAYNE FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Larry v. State of Oregon, et al
as 19-35238
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBINANN COGBURN, Contractor of Oregon Vocational Rehabilitation Services, in her professional and individual capacities, ROBERT COSTELLO, DONNA DUFF and others
Defendant:
LUAHNA UDE, Contractor of Oregon Vocational Rehabilitation Services, in her professional and individual capacitiy
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT J. LARRY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01892
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
503) 323-9019 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
