Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Matthew Faison v. Clive Davis, et al
as 22-16061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW L. FAISON
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIVE DAVIS, JOYCE STREET SIMS and VALERIE SIMPSON
Matthew Faison v. Clive Davis, et al
as 20-17517
Defendant / Appellee:
VALERIE SIMPSON, CLIVE DAVIS and JOYCE STREET SIMS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW L. FAISON
Guler et al v. Hopsack and Silk Productions, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05559
Defendant:
Valerie Simpson, Hopsack and Silk Productions, Inc. and Hopsack & Silk Records, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Faith Guler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Faison v. Davis et al
as 4:2020cv02792
Plaintiff:
Matthew Levi Faison
Defendant:
Joyce Street Sims, Clive Davis and Valerie Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson et al v. NRG Energy, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00862
Defendant:
Ace American Insurance Company, Daryl Miller and NRG Energy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Valery Simpson and Arthur Square, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Chun v. Simpson et al
as 1:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
Curtis Paul Chun
Defendant:
Victoria Simpson, Veronica Simpson, Valerie Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv12679
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simpson et al v. Sexton et al
as 5:2011cv00867
Defendant:
Gary S Sexton , Sheriffs Dept Webster Parish , Sherry Bagwell and others
Plaintiff:
Milton Simpson and Valerie Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv14619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap)
Type:
Other Statutes
Simpson v. United States Post Office
as 1:2009cv00384
Plaintiff:
Valerie Simpson
Defendant:
United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
