Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Kersey v. Catawba Valley Medical Center
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Horace Kersey
Defendant:
Catawba Valley Medical Center and NC Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kersey v. Catawba Valley Medical Center et al
as 5:2023ct03357
Plaintiff:
Horace Kersey
Defendant:
Catawba Valley Medical Center and NC Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association et al
as 5:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Glenn Henderson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Duke Energy Progress, LLC, Food Lion, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Abdel-Malak v. Cape Fear Valley Medical Center et al
as 5:2020cv00221
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Abanoob Abdel-Malak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. CATAWBA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
as 1:2015cv00587
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTOINE WILSON
Defendant:
CATAWBA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Ammons et al
as 5:2014cv00210
Plaintiff:
Glenn Henderson
Defendant:
Jim Ammons, Mary Ann Tally, Nathan Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. McClure et al
as 5:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
James Henry Smith
Defendant:
Bryan McClure, Jane Doe and Catawba Valley Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. Gramham et al
as 5:2010mc00048
Plaintiff:
George Victor Stokes
Defendant:
Mark A. Gramham, F. Andrew Morfesis, Manoj K. Gupta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
