Cases 31 - 40 of 122
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
as 4:2020cv05640
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and Lyft, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Epic Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Donald R. Cameron, Kabam, Inc., Microsoft Corporation and others
Not Classified By Court:
Roblox, Inc., Spotify USA Inc., Yoga Buddhi Co. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Facebook, Inc.
Petitioner:
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 18 Media Organizations, App Annie Inc. and Amazon.com Services LLC
Amicus Curiae:
Robert Pepper, Edward W. Hayter, Stephen H. Schwartz and others
Intervenor:
Nintendo of America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation
Sharon Whitehead v. Aurora Pump Company
as 20-1676
Defendant / Appellee:
FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC, Wholly owned subsidiary of Emerson Electric Compnay, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant:
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, STERLING FLUID SYSTEMS USA LLC, f/k/a Peerless Pumps Co., MCNALLY INDUSTRIES, INC., successor-in-interest to NORTHERN FIRE APPARATUS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARON K. WHITEHEAD, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of JAMES T. WHITEHEAD, Deceased
Sherri Deem v. The William Powell Company, et al
as 20-35165
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN CRANE, INC., CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHERRI L. DEEM, individually and as Personal Representative for the estate of Thomas A. Deem, deceased
Ironburg Inventions Ltd. v. Valve Corporation
as 20-1379
Appellant:
IRONBURG INVENTIONS LTD.
Appellee:
VALVE CORPORATION
Valve Corporation v. Ironburg Inventions Ltd.
as 20-1316
Appellee:
IRONBURG INVENTIONS LTD.
Appellant:
VALVE CORPORATION
Valve Corporation v. Ironburg Inventions Ltd.
as 20-1315
Appellee:
IRONBURG INVENTIONS LTD.
Appellant:
VALVE CORPORATION
Connie Dietrich v. The Boeing Company, et al
as 19-56409
Defendant:
SOCO WEST, INC., Brenntag West, Inc. f/k/a SOCO-Lynch Corporation successor in interest to Western Chemical and Manufacturing, Co., WESTERN AUTO SUPPLY COMPANY, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., individually and as successor in interest to Owens-Illinois Glass Company and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONNIE DIETRICH, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
THE BOEING COMPANY, improperly denominated as The Boeing Company, individually and as successor by merger to McDonnell Douglas Corporation, successor by merger with Dougla Aircraft Company
Maria Varney v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporati, et al
as 19-35859
Defendant / Appellee:
WEIR VALVES & CONTROLS USA INC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, JOHN CRANE, INC. and others
Defendant:
VIKING PUMP, INC., ALFA LAVAL, INC., SB DECKING, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIA VARNEY, Individually and as Personal Representative for the Estate of Donald Varney
Marietta Yaw, et al v. GE, et al
as 19-35816
Defendant / Appellee:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, CBS CORPORATION, FKA Viacom, Inc., sued as successor-by-merger to CBS Corporation, FKA Westinghouse Electric Corporation, also as successor-in-interest to BF Sturtevant and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Defendant:
WESTERN AUTO SUPPLY, VIKING PUMP, INC., GARDNER-DENVER, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD ARTHUR YAW
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIETTA DIANNE YAW, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Donald Arthur Yaw
Sinclair Wyoming Refining v. Applied Control Equipment, et al
as 19-8053
Defendant / Appellee:
FISHER SERVICE CO., a Delaware limited liability company, doing business as Fisher Controls International, Inc., now known as Fisher Controls International, LLC, NKA Fisher Controls International LLC, AKA Fisher Controls International, Inc., INSTRUMENT & VALVE SERVICES COMPANY, a Delaware company, EMERSON PROCESS MANAGEMENT LLLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and others
Defendant:
HOWE-BAKER ENGINEERS, LTD., a Texas limited partnership, A & B BUILDERS, LTD., a Texas limited partnership and MATRIX ENGINEERING, LTD., a Texas limited partnership
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SINCLAIR WYOMING REFINING COMPANY, a Wyoming corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
