Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Van Meter et al v. Chevron Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv03562
Defendant:
Chevron Corporation, Chevron U.S.A. Inc and Chevron Nigeria Limited
Plaintiff:
Ms. Breana Brandes, Ms. Anita Van Meter, Ms. Mya Van Meter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nieto v. Van Meter et al
as 3:2020cv03067
Defendant:
Christy Van Meter and All Care Professional Health Inc
Plaintiff:
April Nieto
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
James-David Van Meter v. USA
as 20-40441
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES-DAVID VAN METER
Van Meter v. Shipchandler
as 4:2019cv00064
Defendant:
Shamoil Shipchandler
Plaintiff:
James-David Van Meter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Magee v. Our Lady of Angels Hospital et al
as 2:2017cv17281
Plaintiff:
Montrell Magee
Defendant:
Our Lady of Angels Hospital, Schumacher Group, Donna Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettit et al v. Heebe et al
as 2:2015cv03084
Defendant:
Frederick R. Heebe , Thomas C Rhodes and Markel American Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Brenda Pettit , Van Meter Pettit , Noble Gregory Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Prospect Capital Corporation v. Michael Enmon et al
as 4:2011cv00601
Plaintiff:
Prospect Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Michael P Enmon , The Enmon Irrevocable Family Trust , Timothy D Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Van Meter v. Ealey et al
as 1:2009cv00287
Plaintiff:
Andrew Michael Van Meter
Defendant:
Cliffton Ealey, Jenetha Carroll and Debora Whittle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Meter v. USA
as 4:2008cv00339
Petitioner:
James Van Meter
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
