Cases 1 - 10 of 12
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and Captain GLENDA HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Respondent:
Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN and MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN, Lieutenant HARBERT, Sgt MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANNESS v. COPPERHEAD BAIL BONDING COMPANY
as 4:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VANNESS and KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
COPPERHEAD BAIL BONDING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANNESS v. BAILEY
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VANNESS and KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
BRIAN BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOPE v. SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICINE et al
as 7:2018cv00144
Defendant:
SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICINE, R SWAIN and LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
NICKOLAS VAN NESS HOPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOPE v. BELL et al
as 7:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
NICKOLAS VAN NESS HOPE
Defendant:
BELL, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS and SHIRLEY LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hope v. NESMITH et al
as 7:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
NICKOLAS VAN NESS HOPE
Defendant:
PAMELA NESMITH, WILLIAM WOOLRIDGE and JAMIE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Levett et al
as 1:2014cv02830
Plaintiff:
James Edward Tucker
Defendant:
Eric J. Levett, Rockdale County Local Government, County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilder et al v. Rockdale County et al
as 1:2013cv02715
Plaintiff:
Renee Wilder
Defendant:
Rockdale County , Richard A. Oden , Oz Nesbitt, Sr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
