Cases 1 - 8 of 8
XIONG et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2020cv01346
Defendant:
CHASE BANK, CITIBANK, WELLS FARGO BANK and others
Plaintiff:
SHOUA MOUA, BRANDY XIONG, JOHN TOU XIONG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Cathryn Salerno v. Anthem, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv02814
Plaintiff:
Cathryn Salerno , Denise Medina-Alvero , Ed Zane and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc and The Anthem Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leonard-Rufus El et al v. OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 8:2013cv03056
Plaintiff:
Brenda Leonard-Rufus El and Rahn Edward Rufus El
Defendant:
OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC, US Mortgage Finance Corporation, MERS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Andrew Smith, et al v. ComputerTraining.com, Incorpor, et al
as 11-2625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW SMITH, ANDREW LAPORTE, JASON LOWE and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SPRADER, LORNE COUCH, DAVID RHEAD and others
Defendant:
COMPUTERTRAINING.COM, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
SALLIE MAE INC.
Andrew Smith, et al v. ComputerTraining.com, Incorpor, et al
as 11-1355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW SMITH, ANDREW LAPORTE, JASON LOWE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COMPUTERTRAINING.COM, INCORPORATED and SALLIE MAE INC.
Smith et al v. ComputerTraining.com, Incorporated et al
as 2:2010cv11490
Plaintiff:
Andrew Smith , Andrew Laporte , Jason Lowe and others
Defendant:
ComputerTraining.com, Incorporated, ComputerTraining.edu, LLC and CTCI Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atkinson et al v. Fisher et al
as 1:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Neil Atkinson and PLR
Defendant:
Ronald Fisher, Ronald Fisher, Wells Fargo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Vang v. Seattle Service Bureai, Inc.
as 0:2007cv02654
Plaintiff:
Xiong Pao Vang
Defendant:
Seattle Service Bureai, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
