Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Gomez et al v. Voodoo Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04084
Plaintiff:
Victor Gomez and Francisco Marcos
Defendant:
Voodoo Inc. , Genki-To-Go, LLC , Genki IV, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Gomez-Rivera v. US
as 14-2029
Petitioner - Appellant:
VICTOR GOMEZ-RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01423
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00808
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Title VII
Victor Gomez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-70514
Petitioner:
VICTOR MANUEL GOMEZ, AKA Victor Gomez, AKA Victor Gomez Ramirez, AKA Jose Mateo Ramirez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Squitieri-Sifontes et al
as 3:2013cv01794
Plaintiff:
Paul Squitieri-Sifontes , Emma Gomez-De Perez , Nelson Ramos-Irizarry and others
Defendant:
UBS Bank USA , UBS Financial Service, Inc. , UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Fernandez et al v. Kinray, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04938
Plaintiff:
Esmeralda Amaya, Norma Amaya, Roberto Amaya and others
Defendant:
William Bodinger, Cardinal Health, Inc., Kerry Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Daniel Rouster v. Saginaw County, et al
as 13-1673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROUSTER, PR
Defendant:
SAGINAW COUNTY, ALVIN RIMMER, Shift Commander, MICHAEL VANHORN, Officer and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SECURE CARE, INCORPORATED, CATHLEEN CONLEY, RMA, STELLA MENCHACA, LPN and others
Gomez-Rivera v. USA
as 3:2013cv01305
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Victor Gomez-Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Victor Gomez-Cazares v. USA
as 13-15381
Petitioner - Appellant:
VICTOR GOMEZ-CAZARES
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
