Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01522
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Vij v. Jhanjee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01621
Plaintiff: Vicky Vij agent of d/b/a Bukhara Grill NYC and Vicky Vij doing business as Bukhara Grill NYC
Defendant: Akshay Jhanjee agent of d/b/a Bukhara Grill, Jhanjee Hospitality, LLC, RMCBGNY, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02911
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02781
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SPEAR v. OPTIMAL STRATEGIX GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03361
Plaintiff: DAVID SPEAR
Defendant: OPTIMAL STRATEGIX GROUP, INC., RAMAMIRTHAM SUKUMAR and ARVIND VIJ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Harvey v. Vij
as 2:2022cv00847
Plaintiff: John Clayton Harvey
Defendant: Neeraj K Vij
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02590
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Anderson v. Coherent, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv04505
Plaintiff: Jerome Anderson
Defendant: Beverly Kay Matthews, Andreas W. Mattes, Coherent, Inc. and others
WATERMAN v. COHERENT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02623
Plaintiff: MARC WATERMAN
Defendant: II-VI INCORPORATED, BEVERLY KAY MATTHEWS, MICHAEL MCMULLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Finger v. Coherent, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv04217
Defendant: Andreas W Mattes, Beverly Kay Matthews, Michael R McMullen and others
Plaintiff: Susan Finger

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?