Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Suarez et al v. Bald Knob Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2021cv00376
Defendant:
Johnny Hodges, Goolsby Inc doing business as Goolsby General Contractors Inc, Bill Feagin and others
Plaintiff:
Misain Suarez and Nieves Suarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ashley v. Kelley et al
as 4:2019cv00576
Defendant:
Jeremy Andrew, Gary Arnold, Richard Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Kelley et al
as 4:2019cv00578
Defendant:
Jeremy Andrew, Gary Arnold, Richard Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Moore, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arras v. Kelley et al
as 4:2019cv00577
Defendant:
Jeremy Andrew, Tonya Parker, Richard Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor Michael Arras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashley v. Robinson et al
as 4:2019cv00506
Defendant:
Meagan Burns, Mike Robinson, Tonya Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helena Chemical Company v. Young et al
as 3:2015cv00151
Plaintiff:
Helena Chemical Company
Defendant:
Vince Young and Vince Young Farms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilmoth v. Roberts et al
as 6:2015cv06057
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Wilmoth
Defendant:
Dan Roberts, Sheila Sharp, Jerry Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick v. City of Rogers, Arkansas et al
as 5:2015cv05120
Plaintiff:
Darrell Frederick
Defendant:
City of Rogers, Arkansas, Vince Motsinger, Nick Torkelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilmoth v. Roberts et al
as 4:2015cv00271
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Wilmoth
Defendant:
Dan Roberts, Sheila Sharp, Jerry Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick v. Rogers, Arkansas, City of et al
as 5:2013cv05155
Plaintiff:
Darrell Frederick
Defendant:
Rogers, Arkansas, City of , Vince Motsinger , Nick Torkelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
