Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Lipscomb v. Slonaker et al
as 7:2024cv00250
Plaintiff: Daniel Thomas Lipscomb
Defendant: Katlynn Slonaker, Caroline Helsley, Amber Dopkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kahlon v. Choi et al
as 4:2023cv01118
Plaintiff: Valentina Kahlon
Defendant: Eun Young Choi, General Merrick B. Garland, Attorney Christopher A. Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Charles Inko-Tariah v. Muriel Bowser, et al
as 23-7103
Plaintiff / Appellant: Charles Awusin Inko-Tariah
Defendant / Appellee: Muriel Bowser and Kevin Vorndran
INKO-TARIAH v. BOWSER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01664
Plaintiff: CHARLES AWUSIN INKO-TARIAH
Defendant: MURIEL BOWSER and KEVIN VORNDRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oscar Dantzler v. DOJ, et al
as 20-5334
Defendant / Appellee: Agents One-Five, United States Department of Justice Office, Louisiana Commission of Human Rights Office of the Governor, Micheal McClananhan, Individually and in his capacity as the State of Louisiana President and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Oscar Dantzler
VORNDRAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv98374
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JOSEPH VORNDRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VORNDRAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-98374
Plaintiff: VORNDRAN
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
VORNDRAN JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-47384
Plaintiff: VORNDRAN JR
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
VORNDRAN JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv47384
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: RUDOLPH VORNDRAN JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01505
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?