Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HOYLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03079
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W HOYLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc. v. Hoyle
as 0:2015cv01753
Plaintiff:
Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Mr. David W Hoyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc. v. Hoyle
as 2:2015cv01753
Plaintiff:
Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
David W. Hoyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Bloom v. Hoyle
as 5:2015mc00006
Petitioner:
Ira Bloom
Respondent:
W. Hoyle
Barker et al v. Credit Suisse AG et al
as 1:2014cv00036
Plaintiff:
Charles Barker, Susan L. Barker, Lawrence Burgee and others
Defendant:
Credit Suisse AG, Credit Suisse Securities (USA), LLC, Credit Suisse First Boston LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mee v. Hoyle et al
as 5:2013ct03261
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Carroll Mee
Defendant:
David W. Hoyle, Brian Zieverink and State of North Carolina Department of Revenue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Red Wolf Coalition et al v. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission et al
as 2:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
Red Wolf Coalition , Defenders of Wildlife and Animal Welfare Institute
Defendant:
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission , Jim Cogdell , John Litton Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Osten v. Shaw Group Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00663
Defendant:
James F Barker, James M Bernhard, Jr., Thomas E Capps and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Osten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
HomeAway, Inc. et al v. David W. Hoyle, Secretary of Revenue for the State of North Carolina
as 1:2011cv00895
Plaintiff:
HomeAway, Inc. and HomeAway.com, Inc.
Defendant:
David W. Hoyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
