Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Boxley v. 21st Century Charter School at Gary, Inc., et al.
as 2:2023cv00270
Defendant:
Andre and Aquanita N. Boxley, As Father and Mother and next of kin of A.B., a Minor, 21st Century Charter School @ Gary, Inc., W. Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Boxley and Aquanita N. Boxley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Southern Environmental Management & Specialists, Inc. v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Southern Environmental Management & Specialists, Inc.
Defendant:
Richard W. Lee, Hannah Lee Naquin, Hunter R. Lee and others
Counter Defendant:
Mark Morgan and Adam Morgan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv09116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ripley v. Bexar County et al
as 5:2021cv00333
Defendant:
San Antonio, Texas, San Antonio Water System, Deputy S Carillo and others
Plaintiff:
John Ripley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Lee et al
as 2:2021cv02156
Defendant:
David B Rausch and William Lee
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Sean W. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11577
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00660
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
