Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Murzike v. Knox et al
as 3:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Tifani S. Knox, Richard J. Andrews, R.D. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stock v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2019cv00561
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. Stock
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Stocking v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2014cv01970
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Stocking
Defendant:
James Dzurenda and Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stocking v. Pulvirenti et al
as 3:2014cv01772
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Stocking
Defendant:
Gino Pulvirenti , William Mudano and Vincent Mazzotta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Stocking v. Mckay
as 3:2014cv01205
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Stocking
Defendant:
Antonina Mckay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Jones et al
as 2:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Maurice Jones, Trenton E. Jones, Jennifer J. Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Stock et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv07664
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Stock and Raymond W. Stock, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stock v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22575
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Stock
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gary Stocking v. Middletown Police Dept.
as 11-2579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gary W. Stocking
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Middletown, Dino Pulvir, Officer, Vincent Mazzotta, Officer and others
Stocking v. Middletown Police Dept. et al
as 3:2011cv00587
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Stocking
Defendant:
Middletown Police Dept. and City of Middletown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
