Cases 31 - 40 of 185
Phamatech Incorporated v. Walgreen, Co. et al
as 1:2021cv06886
Counter Defendant:
Phamatech Incorporated
Counter Claimant:
Walgreen Co
Defendant:
Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZEIKOS INC. v. WALGREEN CO.
as 2:2021cv19993
Plaintiff:
ZEIKOS INC.
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lindblad v. Walgreens Corporations et al
as 3:2021cv07507
Plaintiff:
Robert Lindblad
Defendant:
Walgreens Corporations, Starbucks Coffee and Arapahoe County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walgreen Company v. BML Management, LLC
as 5:2021cv00822
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Company
Defendant:
BML Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strickland v. Purdue Pharmaceutical Products, L.P. et al
as 1:2021op45058
Defendant:
HEB LP, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Clay Strickland and Kathy Strickland
Phamatech Incorporated v. Walgreen, Co. et al
as 3:2021cv01234
Plaintiff:
Phamatech Incorporated
Defendant:
Walgreen, Co. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
C3 Investments Inc et al v. Walgreen Co
as 2:2021cv01509
Plaintiff:
C3 Investments Inc and C3 Investments of Chapin LLC
Defendant:
Walgreen Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clem v. Skinner et al
as 1:2021cv00406
Nominal Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Aliance, Inc.
Defendant:
George R. Fairweather, James A. Skinner, Jose E. Almeida and others
Plaintiff:
James Clem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Strickland v. Purdue Pharmaceutical Products, L.P. et al
as 4:2021cv01176
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Walgreen Co., PURDUE PHARMACEURITCAL PRODUCTS, L.P and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN CLAY STRICKLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gray et al v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00856
Plaintiff:
Erika Brown, Kenneth Brewer, Lisa Satchel and others
Defendant:
LNK International, Inc. and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
