Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 30
ROCHESTER v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2023cv00192
Plaintiff: FAHEEM ROCHESTER
Defendant: WARDEN IRWIN, DR. HORWICK, C/O MASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2021cv00059
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2021cv00021
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jinxu Gao v. David Paulk, et al
as 21-10158
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS GILES, CHAD WOLF, JEFFREY A. ROSEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: JINXU GAO
Angus v. Ward et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv00108
Defendant: Georgia State Legislature, J-Pay, Secikus Technologies, Timothy C. Ward and others
Plaintiff: Douglas Angus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00080
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00206
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00106
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mahoney v. Rupska et al
as 5:2019hc02163
Respondent: William Barr, Associate Warden Rupska and Assistant Warden Irwin
Petitioner: Brian Edward Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00051
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?