Cases 1 - 10 of 437
Gonzales v. Gittere et al
as 2:2024cv00816
Petitioner:
Raul Gonzales
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TERRELL v. WHATLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL, JR
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TABATHA WHATLEY, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD, TARMARSHE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2635
Plaintiff:
KENTRELL D WELCH
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAM GITTERE, WILLIAM RUEBART, DAVID DRUMMOND and others
Gray v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv01751
Petitioner:
Ronald B. Gray
Respondent:
Warden William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Williams, et al.
as 24-2410
Plaintiff:
PAUL JONES
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAMS, High Desert State Prison, Corrections Officer HILL, High Desert State Prison and HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON
Singleton v. Warden Williams et al
as 1:2024cv02791
Plaintiff:
Dirk D. Singleton
Defendant:
Warden Williams, Stateville/NRC, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Williams
as 3:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Agualar Lewis
Defendant:
Warden Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smtih v. Williams
as 3:2024cv01048
Plaintiff:
James Smtih
Defendant:
Warden Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loggins v. Huffman et al
as 6:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Loggins
Defendant:
J. Huffman, C. Kirkland, Unknown Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00888
Petitioner:
Kareem Eugene Hunt
Defendant:
State of Maryland and Warden William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
