Cases 1 - 10 of 40
WARE v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
JOSIAH BENJAMIN WARE
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARE v. SANOFI US SERVICES INC. et al
as 4:2023cv00186
Defendant:
SANOFI US SERVICES INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS US, INC. and SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC
Plaintiff:
VALERIE WARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WENZHOU XIN XIN SANITARY WARE CO., LTD. v. DELTA FAUCET COMPANY
as 1:2023cv02057
Plaintiff:
WENZHOU XIN XIN SANITARY WARE CO., LTD
Defendant:
DELTA FAUCET COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
DELTA FAUCET COMPANY v. WENZHOU XIN XIN SANITARY WARE CO., LTD
as 1:2023cv01633
Plaintiff:
DELTA FAUCET COMPANY
Defendant:
WENZHOU XIN XIN SANITARY WARE CO., LTD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
WARE v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
RAYDEZ WARE
Defendant:
WILLIAMS and TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARE v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
JERRY WARE
Defendant:
S. KALLIS and E2 HOUSING/UNIT TEAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ware v. State of Ind et al
as 3:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Malik Ware and Malik Alonzo Ware
Defendant:
State of Ind, Elkhart County Jail, John or Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASAWAY et al v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2021cv00454
Plaintiff:
MR. JUSTIN C GASAWAY, MR. PAUL D AUBIN, MR. DYLLON WARE and others
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY JAIL, JOHN PLASSE, JOHN DOE, 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARE v. WATSON
as 2:2021cv00431
Petitioner:
TERRY WARE
Respondent:
TJ WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WARE v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2021cv02244
Plaintiff:
ARIANA WARE
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
