Cases 21 - 30 of 38
BUMGARDNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2011cv00338
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUMGARDNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COUNTY OF SANTA ROSA, SANTA ROSA COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANNING v. HALL
as 3:2011cv00224
Plaintiff:
JAMES M MANNING, JR
Defendant:
WENDELL HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Thompson, et al v. Wendell Hall, et al
as 11-10029
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL R. THOMPSON and CATHY A. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellant:
WENDELL HALL, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Santa Rosa County Florida and JERRY D. UTSEY, In his individual capacity
:
SERVICE
REYNOLDS et al v. HALL
as 3:2010cv00355
Defendant:
WENDELL HALL
Plaintiff:
LOUIS REYNOLDS and JEFFERY MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pacitti v. HALL et al
as 3:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Warren Pacitti
Defendant:
WENDELL HALL and Timothy Kyles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eva Locke, et al v. Joyce Shore, et al
as 10-11052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVA LOCKE, PATRICIA ANNE LEVENSON, BARBARA VANDERKOLK GARDNER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOYCE SHORE, EHRIG, AIDA BAO-GARCIGA and others
Gavitt v. HALL et al
as 3:2009cv00377
Plaintiff:
Michael Richard Gavitt
Defendant:
WENDELL HALL, Todd Martin and Jerry Salter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Qualls v. Arkansas State Hospital et al
as 4:2009cv00424
Plaintiff:
Donnie Jay Qualls
Defendant:
Arkansas State Hospital, Oliver Wendel Hall, III, Linda Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOCKE et al v. SHORE et al
as 4:2009cv00193
Plaintiff:
EVA LOCKE, PATRICIA ANNE LEVENSON, BARBARA VANDERKOLK GARDNER and others
Defendant:
JOYCE SHORE, JOHN P. EHRIG, AIDA BAO-GARCIGA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
HAWTHORNE v. HALL
as 3:2009cv00163
Petitioner:
MELVIN D HAWTHORNE
Defendant:
WENDELL HALL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
