Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wentz v. Ames et al
as 2:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Wentz
Defendant:
Superintendent Donald Ames, Asso. Superintendent Jonathan Frame, Major Josh Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Null et al
as 3:2017cv04126
Plaintiff:
Courtney Ricardo Robinson
Defendant:
Cindy Null, Lahoma Wentz and Cabell County Magistrate Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wentz v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15199
Plaintiff:
Elwanda Wentz
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wentz et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11927
Plaintiff:
Eileen Wentz and Delbert L. Wentz
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wentz v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02261
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Wentz
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wentz et al v. Valicor Environmental Services, LLC
as 3:2014cv29426
Plaintiff:
Clifton Vaughn Wentz and Lynda Gail Wentz
Defendant:
Valicor Environmental Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bilmar Limited Partnership v. Prima Marketing, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv14391
Plaintiff:
Bilmar Limited Partnership
Defendant:
Prima Marketing, LLC , 7-11, Inc. and Don Wentz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wentz v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv12021
Plaintiff:
Jyll Wentz
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wentz v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv08208
Plaintiff:
Lana Kay Wentz
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wentz v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv07423
Plaintiff:
Michael Wentz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
