Cases 1 - 10 of 310
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 24-10362
Petitioner:
Joseph Leonard Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Jerry Dean Smith, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
Jerry Dean Smith, Jr
Respondent:
Benny Bundy and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00073
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Lamar County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 4:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
Johnny Dale Smith Jr. and Johnny Smith
Defendant:
Lamar County Sheriff's Office and Auto Task Force
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. Flagstar Bank, FSB et al
as 4:2023cv03945
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, FSB, Alessandro P Dinello and Stephen Figliuolo
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Smith, Jr. et al v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
John Smith, Jr. and Mary E. Smith
Defendant:
Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Smith v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London
as 2:2023cv02999
Plaintiff:
Lamar Smith and Lamar Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
