Cases 21 - 30 of 69
(PC) Chapman v. Sacramento Co. Dist. Atty's Office et al
as 2:2018cv02662
Defendant:
Ann Marie Schubert and Sacramento Co. Dist. Atty's Office
Plaintiff:
William Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shomo v. State of New York et al
as 1:2018cv00916
Defendant:
Cluadia Mott, Karl Fougerson, Jane Hyland and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Shomo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
William Chapman
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chapman v. Schubert
as 2:2017cv01488
Plaintiff:
William Chapman
Defendant:
Ann Marie Schubert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREATER DRIFTWOOD ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC et al v. WALTON COUNTY FLORIDA et al
as 3:2017cv00294
Plaintiff:
GREATER DRIFTWOOD ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC , DORIS BEAM , JAMES HOPSON and others
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY FLORIDA , SARA COMANDER , WILLIAM CHAPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Chapman v. J. Price
as 16-17126
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM CHAPMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
J. PRICE
Chapman v. Price
as 2:2016cv02108
Petitioner:
William Chapman
Respondent:
J. Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lindsay Cooper, et al v. Tokyo Electric Power Co.
as 15-56424
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LINDSAY R. COOPER, JAMES R. SUTTON, KIM GIESEKING and others
Defendant - Appellant:
TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC., AKA TEPCO
Real Party In Interest:
SOLICITOR GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
WILLIAM J. FALLON, Admiral, THOMAS B. FARGO, Admiral, GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
