Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ettienne v. Peralta et al
as 3:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Ettienne
Defendant:
Lt. Jason Peralta, Sgt. Adam Treinn, Supt. William Cope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Hill, et al v. Mike Dewey, et al
as 20-11563
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIRGIE HILL and DERRICK HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE DEWEY, Sheriff, Brooks County Sheriff Office, TERRY GRIFFIN, Sergeant, Brooks County Invesetigator, JERRY MILLER, Captain, Brooks County Investigator and others
Jacobs v. Harris et al
as 3:2019cv00687
Plaintiff:
Taylor Ross Jacobs
Defendant:
William Cope, Bill Ketron, Tommy Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL et al v. DEWEY et al
as 7:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HILL and VIRGIE HILL
Defendant:
MIKE DEWEY, JERRY MILLER, TERRY GRIFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. BRG Sports, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08972
Plaintiff:
Freddie Adams, Jr. , Marquese Bacon , Todd Bradford and others
Defendant:
BRG Sports, Inc. and Riddell Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. BRG Sports, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00688
Plaintiff:
Freddie Adams, Jr. , Marquese Bacon , Todd Bradford and others
Defendant:
BRG Sports, Inc., Riddell, Inc. and All American Sports Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Owens et al(MAG+)
as 2:2013cv00432
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams
Defendant:
Jeffery Owens, Russell Thomas, William Cope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maddox v. Cope et al (MAG+)
as 2:2013cv00382
Plaintiff:
Booker T. Maddox
Defendant:
William Cope, Jeffery Owens, Officer Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beneficial Investment v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2008cv00360
Plaintiff:
Beneficial Investment, Michael Blair, Denise Blair and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
