Cases 41 - 50 of 50
William Hopkins v. Tyco International (u.s.) Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-77679
Defendant:
Tyco International (u.s.) Inc
Plaintiff:
William Hopkins
Ritchie v. Bradt et al
as 1:2008cv00349
Plaintiff:
Seth Ritchie
Defendant:
Mark Bradt, William Hopkins, Steven Wenderlich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOPKINS v. TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. et al
as 2:2008cv77679
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOPKINS
Defendant:
TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hopkins et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv02407
Plaintiff:
Joyce Hopkins and William Hopkins
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ritchie v. Bradt et al
as 1:2008cv00259
Plaintiff:
Seth Ritchie
Defendant:
Mark Bradt, William Hopkins, Steven Wenderlich and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hopkins et al v. Davol, Inc., et al
as 1:2008cv00348
Plaintiff:
Joyce Hopkins, Joyce Hopkins, Joyce Hopkins and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Abreu v. Merson et al
as 6:2007cv06491
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Merson, A. Hunt, R. Griel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arsenault et al v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. et al
as 3:2007cv00785
Plaintiff:
Shirley Arsenault, Shirley Arsenault, Shirley Arsenault and others
Defendant:
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and Philip Morris USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hopkins v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv06014
Plaintiff:
William Hopkins
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc., Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc., Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
United States v. Hopkins
as 06-3067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES WILLIAM HOPKINS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
