Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Simon v. Lee et al
as 8:2015cv00504
Plaintiff:
Allen Simon, Jr
Defendant:
Paul Lee, Earl Gilliam, Scott Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Nettles et al
as 3:2015cv00022
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester
Respondent:
Williams N. Nettles, B. Obama, Alan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Tandy Carter
as 14-2258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA JEAN BURNS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, GINGLIAT, BETTIS AND SAVITZ LAW FIRM, THE, in its corporate capacity, for damages and for qui tam recovery and others
Campbell v. Nettles et al
as 6:2014cv03828
Plaintiff:
Garnett R Campbell, Jr
Defendant:
William N Nettles, Angela Lewis, Kimberly Whittle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Stephens et al
as 6:2014cv02541
Plaintiff:
Michael F Myers
Defendant:
David C Stephens, William N Nettles, Eric Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Julian Rochester v. James Page
as 14-6671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES PAGE, GPH, STONEY DRAKE, GPH, K. F. MCDONALD, Mag and others
Samuel Smith v. Jean Toal
as 14-1280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL N. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JEAN H. TOAL, RICK QUINN, T. STEPHEN LYNCH and others
Smith v. Toal et al
as 3:2014cv00507
Plaintiff:
Samuel N Smith
Defendant:
Jean H Toal, Rick Quinn, T Stephen Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nettles v. Mellon & Webster PC et al
as 3:2012cv01711
Plaintiff:
William N Nettles
Defendant:
Mellon & Webster PC and Thomas E Mellon, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brunson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 3:2012cv00152
Plaintiff:
Ronald Brunson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Eric Holder and William N Nettles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
