Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Willie Johnson v. Colette Peters, et al
as 20-35855
Defendant / Appellee:
JONATHAN LO, COLETTE S. PETERS, JERRY MORDHORST and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE LEE JOHNSON
Johnson v. Peters et al
as 2:2019cv01474
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Brad Cain, David S. Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv00307
Plaintiff:
Cesar Gonzalez
Defendant:
J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. and Willie Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willie Johnson v. Colette Peters, et al
as 18-35202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE LEE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COLETTE PETERS, BRAD CAIN, SUNQUEST and others
Johnson v. Peters et al
as 2:2017cv01872
Defendant:
Brad Cain, Colette S. Peters and Lt. Sunquest
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY)
as 2:2009cv84643
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE COMPANY, A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), VIACOM INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE LEE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Quarterman, et al
as 08-10260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE LEE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, CHRISTINA MELTON CRAIN, Chairman, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Division, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Johnson v. Quarterman et al
as 5:2007cv00225
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Christina Melton Crain, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
