Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv01308
Plaintiff:
Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation, Winzeler Stamping Co., Radiator Specialty Company doing business as Omega Process Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Property Damage
ENCOMPASS HOME & AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY v. HOSE ASSEMBLIES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05291
Plaintiff:
ENCOMPASS HOME & AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
HOSE ASSEMBLIES, INC., WINZELER STAMPING CO. and HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. doing business as GE APPLIANCES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY v. HOSE ASSEMBLIES, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv14751
Defendant:
WINZELER STAMPING CO., HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. doing business as GE APPLIANCES and HOSE ASSEMBLIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest v. Hose Assemblies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv11714
Defendant:
Winzeler Stamping, Co., Whirlpool, Corp. and Hose Assemblies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest, as subrogee of Paul Sindoni and Filippa Alfe-Sindoni and Home Insurance Company of the Midwest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY v. HOSE ASSEMBLIES, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv11875
Defendant:
WINZELER STAMPING CO., HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. doing business as GE APPLIANCES and HOSE ASSEMBLIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY
Cross Defendant:
HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prince et al v. Electrolux Home Products Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01016
Plaintiff:
Allen J. Clark and Lana Prince
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Radiator Specialty Company and Winzeler Stamping Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
