Cases 1 - 10 of 264,806
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Chenault v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
James C Chenault
Defendant:
S Williams and Pritcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corona et al
as 5:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Angela Corona, Elizabeth Campbell, Elizabeth Middleton and others
Defendant:
State Of California, State of California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Tina Dhillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Giant Bicycle Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Paul Williams
Defendant:
Giant Bicycle Inc., Giant Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Frazier v. Williams Scotsman, Inc.
as 1:2024cv21604
Plaintiff:
Ernestine Frazier
Defendant:
Williams Scotsman, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jiang v. Leverton et al
as 1:2024cv21584
Plaintiff:
Alexander Jiang
Defendant:
Jamie Leverton, Shenif Visram, Joseph Flinn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Jiang v. Leverton et al
as 1:2024cv21591
Plaintiff:
Alexander Jiang
Defendant:
Jamie Leverton, Shenif Visram, Joseph Flinn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Jiang v. Leverton et al
as 1:2024cv21589
Plaintiff:
Alexander Jiang
Defendant:
Jamie Leverton, Shenif Visram, Joseph Flinn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
